requestId:687938b0b24539.98363972.
From Sing Noza’s physical one-yuan three-point structure discussion on the division of Song and Ming dynasties and the judgment of Neo-Confucianism in the People’s Republic of China
Author: Wan Xuting (Associate Professor of Taiwan’s Soulli University)
Source: Author’s manuscript
Abstract
We aim to pass the reality of Spinoza The three-part structure of the “physical/original/style” (compared with the “Tao/nature/game” or “physical/equivalent” of Chinese philosophy) or “physical/original/original” (compared with the “Tao/nature/reason”) in the unity of the Song and Ming dynasties (the three schools of Northern Song Dynasty, the Cheng and Zhu Dynasty, the King of the Heart, and the Chuanshan Mountains) is considered to be a side-research of the unified body or the different aspects of the Tao.
We have taken a step forward to divide the Neo-Confucianism into Xiong Shili, Mou Zongsan, Liang Shuming, and Tang Junyi. Xiong Mou still holds the duality of “body/use”, and Liang Tangshi adopts the three-point “body/use”. This proposed the judgment of the Neo-Confucianism of the People’s Republic of China: Xiong “uses use as nature, and uses no nature in body”, Mou “uses nature as body, uses different nature”, Liang and Tang “uses nature as body, and uses nature in mind.” Reversing the academic bias of “Mu is higher than Tang Dynasty”, the “nature and morphological learning” or “nature intelligence and literacy” developed by Mou’s “uniform and focused on opening the two doors” has become a biased binary system, which has brought a lot of errors to the development of contemporary Confucianism. The “personal metaphysics” and “sensitivity to communicate with the nine realms” of the Tang Dynasty’s original nature theory “nature = mind + birth” are the teachings of the modern body system of Confucianism. Tang Junyi is regarded as the 20th century Liu Weishan and Wang Chuanshan. It is a collection of “mind learning” and “game learning”, and is a model of Chinese-style phenomenon.
Keywords: Sphenosa, Song and Ming Philosophy, Actual/Original/Type, Tao/Nature/Easy, Actual/Originality=Expressor/Expression/Expression
About the issue of Song and Ming Philosophy, there is a three-stage statement about the review of the mind and nature of Saint-Guang (Northern Song Dynasty 3 The theory of the way of heaven and the universe → The theory of the principle of Cheng and Zhu → The theory of the mind and nature of the king of the mind); Mou Zongsan’s first and third series (The three ancestors of the Northern Song Dynasty were one, and the three series of Cheng and Zhu, King of the King of the Rus, and Wufeng and Shan); Tang Junyi’s Hegel-style three-stage theory (Zhou Zhang and Cheng and Zhuzi explore the principles, King of the Rushe explores the physical understanding of the mind, and Chuanshan explores the reality of the principles in the atmosphere); Zhang Dainian’s three-line theory, the principle of the mind, and the atmosphere.
The three types of people who say that they are not irreversible: the three families in the Northern Song Dynasty, the Cheng-Zhu Academy of Sciences, and the King of the Sun. The atmosphere of Liu Huishan and Wang Chuanshan is not beyond the describing of the Taoist theory and mind, but emphasizes the emphasis on the realization of Tao, nature, reason, and mind in “game” (expression and emotion, nature and history), so it can be regarded as the comprehensive and comprehensive completion of Taoist theory and mind. Therefore, although Tang Junyi specially labeled the main nature of learning from the boat mountain, he did not list it as the fourth series.
We have discovered that the three-part structure of the “substance/attribute/mode” of Sphenorsha’s physical monolithic theory (relative to the “Tao/Nature/Easy” or “Substance/Equipment” of Chinese philosophy) or “Substance/attribute/essence” (substance/attribute/essence) ) Three-part structure (commonly to “Tao/Nature/Reason”) provides a super, huge, rigorous, and subtle conceptual structure and system model, which can accommodate the whole or whole of Taoism, science, mind, and atmosphere as a whole. As Liu Weishan said, “The body of Liuhe is one book” and “The combination of Liuhe is unity and dedicated”, and is regarded as the development of the dimensions of the different dimensions of Taoism or Taoism.
Why is Sphenosa? Just as Mou Zongsan believed Cheng Mingdao as the “One-Book Teaching” of Song and Ming Neo-Confucianism, Sphenorsha can also be regarded as the “One-Book Teaching” of modern European Philosophy. The enlightened “benevolent people use all things as one body” and “no inside and outside, no height, one day of people” (Tang Junyi’s words) is a “round and divine” type teaching of “the influence and expression of sensibility”; how many ways Stars deduces the panthesis and ethics system of “god or natural” is a “straight-wise” type teaching of “structure expression of sensibility”.
And “round and god” and “square wisdom” are not completely different, nor are they binary oppositions, but are based on each other and use each other, but are only the level differences between Chinese and Western fools. Sphenosa’s third type of knowledge is “total intuition” and “original intuition” which is a kind of “round and divine”. Although “the words are pure and the evil is hard to see, it is moving and moving in this way” (Zhu Xi’s words)[1], there are also “the concept classification analysis and logical reasoning evidence of “justice is used to wisdom”, such as “the two words of nature are posted by one’s own body”[2], “The heaven’s promise and destiny lies in my nature, and the reasoning of things”[3].
Spinnossa proposed the pantheistic theory of “god or nature”. In the mainstream of Christianity and philosophical science in the seventeenth century Europe, it was regarded as “different” and “devil”, and it was similar to the “one view of heaven and man” in China and India. Sphenorsha’s panthesis caused more terrible anxiety than the unspeakable theory. He was “exposed” by the Church of the Olympiad and buried without “like a dead dog”. He called Confucius “like a dog in a family”, which could be regarded as an example of the “stature of fools” in something. Sphenosa also adopted the most “simple and wisdom” concept analysis and reasoning of oriental logical thinking, so it can be regarded as the main thinking bridge and reference system that connects things with mind! As far as the Eastern world is concerned, St. Noza himself is the main representative of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Modernity, and proposed the forefront concept to promote the representative development structure of modern science, civil politics and capitalism. At the same time, in the actual monolithic discussion of the “holistic nature” thinking has also become the main source of thinking for the self-criticism of the Oriental Fool literati to break through the limitations and blindness of the mind and matter binary and the subject of the initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator of the Initiator.
So, the real monomorphism of Starsha has become the main ideological bridge and reference system that connects the “war between the ancient and the present” and “war between the east and the west”.
We refer to the conceptual structure of “god or natural” of Stars’ “god or natural” to understand the division of Song and Ming dynasties and the judgment of the Neo-Confucianism of the People’s Republic of China. For example, we place the great problem of “distinguishing Chinese and Western civilizations” from the “contradiction between ancient and modern” and “contradiction between the East and the West” TC:
發佈留言